Was the P-38 that bad of a plane considering its losses were 1,750 for 2500 enemy aircrafts destroyed? Not to mention the escort missions and many ground targets destroyed. - Quora

$ 8.99

5
(601)
In stock
Description

Why was Lockheed's P-38 Lightning not successful as a fighter but successful in other roles, such as ground attack and long range escort? - Quora

Lockheed P-38 Lightning - Wikipedia

Was the P-38 that bad of a plane considering its losses were 1,750 for 2500 enemy aircrafts destroyed? Not to mention the escort missions and many ground targets destroyed. - Quora

P-38 Lightning Mach Limits and Other Issues

Was the P-38 that bad of a plane considering its losses were 1,750 for 2500 enemy aircrafts destroyed? Not to mention the escort missions and many ground targets destroyed. - Quora

Was the P-38 that bad of a plane considering its losses were 1,750 for 2500 enemy aircrafts destroyed? Not to mention the escort missions and many ground targets destroyed. - Quora

Why weren't P-38 Lightnings used to escort bombers over Germany before the P-51 Mustangs became available? - Quora

Why was Lockheed's P-38 Lightning not successful as a fighter but successful in other roles, such as ground attack and long range escort? - Quora

Which fighter plane was more instrumental in winning the war in the Pacific in WWII; The F4U Corsair, the P-40E or the F4F Wildcat? - Quora

Was the P-47 designed to take damage from enemy fire? Was it heavily armored? - Quora

Was the P-38 that bad of a plane considering its losses were 1,750 for 2500 enemy aircrafts destroyed? Not to mention the escort missions and many ground targets destroyed. - Quora

Why was Lockheed's P-38 Lightning not successful as a fighter but successful in other roles, such as ground attack and long range escort? - Quora